A Funeral Proposal

 to Avoid More Funerals

Michael Zehaf Bibeau and Martin (Ahmad) Couture-Rouleau tried to give meaning to their lives, tried to achieve martyrdom when they killed the soldiers in Saint Jean and Ottawa respectively.  They should be denied that meaning.  They should be denied martyrdom.

Islam believes that the body and soul remain connected after death.  If the body is comforted or tormented, the soul feels it.  Dogs are extremely naajis (impure, unclean). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “If a dog drinks from the vessel of any one of you, let him wash it seven times.”  On the other hand dead animals are supposed to be treated with at least a minimum of dignity.

So at their funeral, how about burying Michael Zehaf Bibeau and Martin (Ahmad) Couture-Rouleau, each with a dead dog in their grave?  An eternity of impurity, and torment for their souls.  Now, some people may say this is too disrespectful to the killers.  Others will say it’s too disrespectful to the dogs.  But most dogs don’t have a philosophy of purity and impurity, nor do they believe in an afterlife.  So it’s no skin off their backs.  A humane society can easily provide the corpses.

Dogs of murdered soldier Nathan Cirillo
Dogs of murdered soldier Nathan Cirillo

A spokeswoman for a Muslim organization expressed her disgust towards the shooters, saying they didn’t reflect anything in Islam that they learned in Canada.  She also was worried about an anti-Islam backlash.  She, or any Islamic religious leader could do a great service to Canada and the reputation of Islam by attending the funeral of Bibeau and Couture-Rouleau, and publicly cursing, or at least denouncing each of them.

If aspiring terrorists see that their wishes will bring them curses and eternal torment rather than the glories (and 72 virgins) of martyrdom, it will make terrorism a much less attractive career path.  A miserable funeral is not what most people aim for in life.

9 thoughts on “A Funeral Proposal

  1. Dogs are wonderful creatures. They deserve respect. Why should they be sacrificed for this? Unacceptable idea!

    1. Don’t kill a dog for this; bury one put down by the humane society. Who knows what they do with the corpses otherwise?

  2. The time has come for no more symbolic actions. Extremist Islamists only understand forceful aggression.

    The West should resurrect that wonderful French invention, the guillotine.
    For every Isis beheading, you guillotine 10 of the Muzzies, on the public square… on TV, on the Internet, on Twitter and on Facebook. Get rid of Nidal Hasan, the Boston marathon bomber, and everyone still left at Guantanamo Bay.
    Since the guillotine is a Western invention, it is mostly quick and painless, whereas an Isis beheading is slow and torturous. However, that nicety will be lost on the savages.

    War is hell, and Western Civilization needs to survive. It has come down to brute force … piece-meal drone strikes, diplomatic gestures and symbolic actions are signs of compromise and weakness to these barbarians.

    1. I have to disagree with that. We have to fight back with strength vigor and brutality, but what’s the point if we become just like them? Being Muslim is not a capital crime. It’s what a lot of Muslims do that’s a capital crime, or rather, a war crime.

    2. My reply mentioned that the Muslims that warrant destruction are those that have committed terror against us already – Nidal Hasan, the Tcharnaev bomber from Boston, and those still incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay.

      Unfortunately, many prisoners have been freed from Guantanamo, now at large to commit terror and mayhem for years to come (whether in the Middle East or anywhere). All that bravery from our soldiers — wasted! Similar to what is happening in Iraq, as we cede more territory to Isis, that was previously won by our troops.

  3. Hello there…..its me again……Don Laird

    Unlike some, I have, in spite of its political incorrectness, in spite of howls of indignation, in spite of cowering, cringing and creeping cowardice, maintained that there is only one solution to our collective problem with the Muslim and its Islam; deportation



    Its simple; remove from our midst that which seeks our subjugation and or annihilation. Commence a program of arrest and deportation and couple that with mosque deconstruction and the removal of every last vestige of the Muslim and Islam within North America. Finalize that program with the criminalization of Islam.

    Its quite simple really, all it requires is courage and the will to preserve and protect all we have built, all we stand for, all we cherish and love.

    Its quite simple really.

    Food for thought, catalyst for action.

    Regards, Don Laird
    Dogtown Bastard
    Alberta, Canada

  4. I had the exact same idea after 911. Throw a dead dog or pig into the graves of any jihadi that we killed and that would be a very big deterent. Any we capture alive would be spattered with pig blood and then shot.

What's your take?